Agribusiness and farm business valuation
Agribusinesses are valued in three parts: the land, the water entitlements and the operating business. The trading business typically carries 2.5 to 4.0 times normalised EBITDA, assessed across seasons rather than a single year.
Combining land, water and trading operations into one figure is the most common error in rural valuation. Each has its own market, its own evidence base and its own buyers — and in most Queensland agribusinesses the land and water are the larger part of the answer.
Quick answer
What is a farm business worth?
The land at market value, the water entitlements at their own market value, and the operating business at 2.5 to 4.0 times normalised EBITDA averaged across at least five seasons. Supply contracts, secure water and diversified enterprises support the top of the business band. Seasonal volatility, single-buyer exposure and unsecured water pull it down.
What moves the number
What decides the value of the operating business
The land and water are valued on property evidence. The trading business is valued on how reliably it converts those assets into earnings.
| Factor | Pushes toward the top | Pulls toward the bottom |
|---|---|---|
| Water security | Secure entitlements with reliable allocation history, valued separately | Unsecured or low-reliability allocation, or entitlement held outside the entity |
| Supply arrangements | Multi-year supply contracts or processor agreements with pricing mechanisms | Spot-market sales into a single buyer or processor |
| Enterprise diversity | More than one enterprise or commodity, spreading seasonal and price risk | A single commodity fully exposed to one season and one price |
| Infrastructure and plant | Modern irrigation, sheds, handling and machinery in good condition | Deferred maintenance, ageing machinery, infrastructure needing replacement |
| Management | A manager or family succession in place, documented operating systems | Operation dependent entirely on an owner approaching retirement |
-
Water security
↑ Secure entitlements with reliable allocation history, valued separately
↓ Unsecured or low-reliability allocation, or entitlement held outside the entity
-
Supply arrangements
↑ Multi-year supply contracts or processor agreements with pricing mechanisms
↓ Spot-market sales into a single buyer or processor
-
Enterprise diversity
↑ More than one enterprise or commodity, spreading seasonal and price risk
↓ A single commodity fully exposed to one season and one price
-
Infrastructure and plant
↑ Modern irrigation, sheds, handling and machinery in good condition
↓ Deferred maintenance, ageing machinery, infrastructure needing replacement
-
Management
↑ A manager or family succession in place, documented operating systems
↓ Operation dependent entirely on an owner approaching retirement
Normalising the earnings
Normalising a farm P&L
Rural accounts are built for tax outcomes and seasonal smoothing, not for valuation. Restating them is most of the work.
How the earnings method works →- Season averaging Five or more years assessed to span drought, average and strong seasons
- Owner and family labour Every family member’s work costed at a market wage
- Livestock and biological assets Valued at market and separated from trading earnings
- Farm management deposits Deposits and withdrawals removed from the trading result
- Notional land rent A market lease cost applied where the land is valued separately
- Capital versus maintenance Fencing, water infrastructure and land development separated from repairs
Worked example
Worked example: an irrigated cropping enterprise
The property carries 900 hectares with 1,400 megalitres of high-reliability water. Land and water are valued separately as property assets. The trading business reports earnings across five seasons ranging from a $210,000 loss to $1.4m, averaging $620,000 before adjustments.
Two family members work full time without market wages — a $190,000 adjustment. Farm management deposit movements are removed and a notional land rent applied. Normalised trading earnings are $340,000, and with a three-year processor supply contract covering 60 per cent of production, 3.2× applies.
$1.09m for the operating business, valued alongside — never inside — the land and water
Illustrative only. Every engagement is scoped to the specific business, its records and the purpose of the valuation.
What a buyer, a bank or an opposing expert will test first
-
01
Where the water sits
Entitlements held in a different entity from the operation, or leased rather than owned, change the answer completely.
-
02
Season selection
Valuing on the last two seasons is indefensible in agriculture. The period must span the range the region actually experiences.
-
03
Family labour
Unpaid family work is the largest hidden cost in most rural accounts and the largest single normalisation adjustment.
-
04
Livestock counts and condition
Biological assets are counted, classed and valued at market, not carried at tax value.
Questions
Agribusiness valuations, answered
Broader questions are on the full FAQ page.
Ask a valuerNo. Land, water entitlements and the operating business have separate markets and separate buyers, and combining them obscures where the value actually sits. Most Queensland farming operations carry the majority of their value in land and water, with the trading business a modest additional layer — which is critical information for succession planning and family law matters alike.
As a distinct asset, on evidence of trades in the relevant water market, with reliability class and allocation history taken into account. Entitlement value moves independently of land value and, in some catchments, represents a very substantial share of the total.
At least five, and more where the region has recently experienced drought or flood. Agriculture is the sector where a three-year average is least defensible, because three years can easily capture only good seasons or only bad ones.
A valuation that separates land, water, livestock, machinery and the operating business, so the parties can see what is being divided and structure the transfer around it. Where one sibling continues farming and another does not, this separation is usually what makes an agreement possible.
Yes, in-house. Livestock are counted, classed and valued at market; machinery is inspected and valued by a Certified Asset Valuer. Both are commonly carried in the accounts at tax values that bear no relation to what they would realise.
Reviewed by a Certified Practising Valuer
Reviewed by Jarrad Khoury, Director and Head of Valuations — Registered Valuer (QLD, Not Limited), Licensed Valuer (WA, Not Limited), CPV and CBV. Published by Business Valuations Brisbane, the business valuation division of Asset Valuations Group.
Last reviewed
Value the land, the water and the business — separately.
A free 15-minute scoping call, then a fixed fee in writing. No obligation, and nothing you send leaves our office.
1300 778 033